Should Witcher 4 Have an Honor System?

The Witcher universe is known for treating monster hunters as outcast figures in the eyes of the common people. In this world, the characters’ relationships with the public are mostly based on a fixed story. However, could players have a chance to change this perception with Witcher 4? The proposed honor system for the new game in the series has caused controversy.

Witcher 4 Honor System Idea Splits Community

In a discussion on Reddit that received thousands of likes, players discussed whether Witcher 4 should have a Red Dead Redemption 2-style honor system. Many argue that Ciri’s actions would further enhance the atmosphere of the game by having different reactions in cities. Some suggest a region-specific reputation system like Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2, stating that the player’s actions should have real consequences.

However, there are also those who have opposing views. Since the series is based on moral grayness, many players argue that a clear good-evil distinction is not suitable for the Witcher universe. They state that the outcome of choices should remain uncertain, otherwise the storytelling may suffer. It is noted that the Witcher derives its power from difficult and gray moments of decision rather than absolute good or bad options.

Some players think that such a system could technically disrupt gameplay. They state that crime systems may seem impressive at first, but become a burden to players over time. It is stated that especially minor actions such as theft can have serious consequences in the game, which may contradict realism.

When we look at the general picture, the idea of ​​adding an honor system to Witcher 4 has created a clear division among players. If CD Projekt Red introduces such a system that directly affects player preferences, it will have to carefully consider both the integrity of the story and the balance of gameplay.

Read More: Spider-Man 3 Release Date Leaked